↓ Skip to main content

Poly (lactic-glycolic) acid copolymer encapsulation of recombinant adenovirus reduces immunogenicity in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Gene Therapy, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
22 patents

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Poly (lactic-glycolic) acid copolymer encapsulation of recombinant adenovirus reduces immunogenicity in vivo
Published in
Gene Therapy, June 1998
DOI 10.1038/sj.gt.3300647
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer has application to the treatment of diseases of the central nervous system. We demonstrate that a limitation to its use in vivo is an inability to redose to the brain. We show that one factor inhibiting re-dosing is the development of neutralizing anti-adenoviral antibodies. Encapsulation of recombinant adenovirus vectors in poly(lactic/glycolic acid) (PLGA) copolymer enables infection in vitro, in the presence of neutralizing antibodies and results in the release of viable virus for over 100 h. Importantly, encapsulated adenovirus also shows diminished immunogenicity in vivo. Mice immunized with encapsulated recombinant adenoviral vectors show a greater than 45-fold reduction in anti-adenovirus titers relative to non-encapsulated vectors. An extended release formulation of adenovirus that reduces viral immunogenicity and sequesters the viral particle form antibody exposure may improve in vivo efficacy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 37%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Engineering 5 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2026.
All research outputs
#4,068,651
of 26,741,834 outputs
Outputs from Gene Therapy
#604
of 3,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,708
of 33,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene Therapy
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,741,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.