Diagnostic accuracy of the SNAP and Spec canine pancreatic lipase tests for pancreatitis in dogs presenting with clinical signs of acute abdominal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Emergency & Critical Care, April 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 1 X user
reddit: 1 Redditor

podcasts: 1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley: 198 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Diagnostic accuracy of the SNAP and Spec canine pancreatic lipase tests for pancreatitis in dogs presenting with clinical signs of acute abdominal disease
Published in	Journal of Veterinary Emergency & Critical Care, April 2014
DOI	10.1111/vec.12158
Pubmed ID	24739030
Authors	Mark D. Haworth, Giselle Hosgood, Katrin L. Swindells, Caroline S. Mansfield
Abstract	To (i) assess the clinical diagnostic accuracy of SNAP canine pancreatic lipase (cPL) and specific canine pancreatic lipase (Spec cPL) and (ii) assess the agreement of an abnormal test result between SNAP cPL and Spec cPL in dogs presenting with acute abdominal disease.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Italy	1	100%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	1	100%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	2	1%
Italy	1	<1%
United Kingdom	1	<1%
Unknown	194	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Other	46	23%
Student > Postgraduate	24	12%
Student > Master	20	10%
Researcher	18	9%
Student > Bachelor	15	8%
Other	34	17%
Unknown	41	21%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine	89	45%
Medicine and Dentistry	52	26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	9	5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	2	1%
Business, Management and Accounting	1	<1%
Other	1	<1%
Unknown	44	22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.

All research outputs

#6,400,211

of 34,360,257 outputs

Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Emergency & Critical Care

#118

of 1,078 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#48,611

of 253,016 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Emergency & Critical Care

of 17 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.