| Title |
Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Haemophilia, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02399.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. M. SOUCIE, C. WANG, A. FORSYTH, S. FUNK, M. DENNY, K. E. ROACH, D. BOONE, THE HEMOPHILIA TREATMENT CENTER NETWORK |
| Abstract |
Many diseases and injuries can impair joint mobility. Normal reference values are needed to determine extent of impairment to assess and monitor joint motion. There is very little published data describing normal joint range of motion (ROM) for healthy men and women across a wide span of ages. We enrolled male and female subjects aged between 2 and 69 years who were free from conditions that could potentially limit joint mobility for the study. Nine licensed physical therapists used universal goniometers to determine passive joint motion bilaterally of elbow flexion, extension, supination and pronation, shoulder flexion, hip flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension, and ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Descriptive statistics were calculated for male and female subjects in four age groups: 2-8, 9-19, 20-44 and 45-69 years. Joint ROM measurements were obtained on a total of 674 (53.6% female) healthy, normal subjects aged 2-69 years. Female subjects had greater joint mobility in all age groups in nearly all joints and the gender difference was most obvious in measures of ankle plantarflexion, elbow pronation and supination. Range of motion average values for all joints decreased with advancing age for both men and women and, in most cases, were significantly different than most commonly used normative values. Our study of ROM measurements taken by trained physical therapists on a large sample of healthy individuals revealed significant gender- and age-related variation that may be an important consideration in patient assessment. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 8 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 830 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 140 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 117 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 11% |
| Researcher | 45 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 108 | 13% |
| Unknown | 306 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 20% |
| Engineering | 89 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 87 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 70 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 63 | 7% |
| Unknown | 352 | 42% |