↓ Skip to main content

Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies

Overview of attention for article published in Haemophilia, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
843 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies
Published in
Haemophilia, November 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02399.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. M. SOUCIE, C. WANG, A. FORSYTH, S. FUNK, M. DENNY, K. E. ROACH, D. BOONE, THE HEMOPHILIA TREATMENT CENTER NETWORK

Abstract

Many diseases and injuries can impair joint mobility. Normal reference values are needed to determine extent of impairment to assess and monitor joint motion. There is very little published data describing normal joint range of motion (ROM) for healthy men and women across a wide span of ages. We enrolled male and female subjects aged between 2 and 69 years who were free from conditions that could potentially limit joint mobility for the study. Nine licensed physical therapists used universal goniometers to determine passive joint motion bilaterally of elbow flexion, extension, supination and pronation, shoulder flexion, hip flexion and extension, knee flexion and extension, and ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Descriptive statistics were calculated for male and female subjects in four age groups: 2-8, 9-19, 20-44 and 45-69 years. Joint ROM measurements were obtained on a total of 674 (53.6% female) healthy, normal subjects aged 2-69 years. Female subjects had greater joint mobility in all age groups in nearly all joints and the gender difference was most obvious in measures of ankle plantarflexion, elbow pronation and supination. Range of motion average values for all joints decreased with advancing age for both men and women and, in most cases, were significantly different than most commonly used normative values. Our study of ROM measurements taken by trained physical therapists on a large sample of healthy individuals revealed significant gender- and age-related variation that may be an important consideration in patient assessment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 843 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 8 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 830 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 140 17%
Student > Bachelor 117 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 11%
Researcher 45 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 5%
Other 108 13%
Unknown 306 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 20%
Engineering 89 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 10%
Sports and Recreations 70 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 1%
Other 63 7%
Unknown 352 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2025.
All research outputs
#1,647,981
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Haemophilia
#51
of 2,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,399
of 155,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Haemophilia
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.