↓ Skip to main content

Documenting the Density of Subtidal Marine Debris across Multiple Marine and Coastal Habitats

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Documenting the Density of Subtidal Marine Debris across Multiple Marine and Coastal Habitats
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0094593
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Marine debris is recognised globally as a key threatening process to marine life, but efforts to address the issue are hampered by the lack of data for many marine habitats. By developing standardised protocols and providing training in their application, we worked with >300 volunteer divers from 11 underwater research groups to document the scale of the subtidal marine debris problem at 120 sites across >1000 km of the coast of NSW, Australia. Sampling consisted of replicated 25×5 m transects in which all debris was identified, counted, and, where appropriate, removed. Sites ranged from estuarine settings adjacent to major population centres, to offshore islands within marine parks. Estuaries and embayments were consistently found to be the most contaminated habitats. Fishing-related items (and especially monofilament and braided fishing line) were most prevalent at the majority of sites, although food and drink items were important contributors at sites adjacent to population centres. The results identified damaging interactions between marine debris and marine biota at some key locations, highlighting the need for management intervention to ensure habitat sustainability. This study reinforces the important contribution that volunteers can make to assessing conservation issues requiring broad-scale data collection. In this case, citizen scientists delivered data that will inform, and help to prioritise, management approaches at both statewide and local scales. These initial data also provide an important baseline for longer-term, volunteer-based monitoring programs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 165 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 64 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 37 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,788,335
of 33,928,890 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,070
of 222,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,764
of 269,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#457
of 5,286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,928,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.