↓ Skip to main content

捕獲がニホンジカ(Cervus nippon)に与えるストレス : 血清コルチゾールとクレアチンキナーゼの測定

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife and Human Society, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
捕獲がニホンジカ(Cervus nippon)に与えるストレス : 血清コルチゾールとクレアチンキナーゼの測定
Published in
Wildlife and Human Society, December 2013
DOI 10.20798/awhswhs.1.1_1
Authors

山田 晋也, 大竹 正剛, 大場 孝裕, 山口 亮, 大橋 正孝

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,346,235
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife and Human Society
#6
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,782
of 321,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife and Human Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them