↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defective expression of cellular retinol binding protein type 1 and retinoic acid receptors α2, β2, and ǵ2 in human breast cancer cells
Published in
FASEB Journal, July 1996
DOI 10.1096/fasebj.10.9.8801168
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Because the retinoic acid (RA) signaling pathway regulates cell proliferation and differentiation, inactivation of genes integral to the pathway represents a potential mechanism of carcinogenesis. We have studied in human breast cancer cells (T47D, MCF-7, ZR75-1, MDA-MB-231, and BT20) the expression of a subset of retinoid signaling genes that are themselves transcriptionally up-regulated by RA, the cellular retinol binding protein type I (CRBPI) and the RA receptors (RARs) alpha2, beta2, and gamma2. We find that constitutive expression of these genes is low or undetectable, and that expression levels are seldom responsive to 24 h treatment with 1 microM all-trans or 9-cis RA (Northern blot analysis). This is in contrast to breast fibroblasts, which show RA-dependent expression of all four genes under the same conditions. Moreover, normal human breast epithelial cells express CRBPI and RARbeta2 at the mRNA level, suggesting that loss of expression of these genes is tied to malignant transformation. RARbeta2, but not CRBPI, was also expressed in RA-treated MTSV1-7 cells, an immortalized but nontumorigenic luminal epithelial cell line. Lack of CRBPI and RARbeta2 expression in cancer cells was not due to general impairment of RA signaling, as shown by RA activation of a RARE3-tk-CAT reporter in a subclone of MDA-MB-231 cells that did not express either CRBPI or RARbeta2. These results suggest that at least two independent defects in the expression of proteins that function in retinoid signaling may be involved in breast carcinogenesis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 43%
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2003.
All research outputs
#12,440,152
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from FASEB Journal
#6,070
of 14,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,065
of 40,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FASEB Journal
#26
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.