↓ Skip to main content

Radiosurgery in the initial management of malignant gliomas: Survival comparison with the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, July 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Radiosurgery in the initial management of malignant gliomas: Survival comparison with the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis
Published in
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, July 1995
DOI 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00621-q
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery on the survival of patients treated with malignant gliomas. A total of 115 patients from three institutions (75 from the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, 30 from the University of Wisconsin, and 10 from the University of Florida) were treated with a combination of surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and linac-based radiosurgery as part of similar institutional protocols from March 1988 through July 1993. Patients were stratified into six prognostic classes (classes 1-6) based on the recursive partitioning analysis of multiple prognostic factors previously reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. The actuarial 2-year and median survival for all patients analyzed was 45% and 96 weeks, respectively. In comparison to the results from a previously published analysis of 1578 patients entered on three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group external beam radiotherapy protocols from 1974 to 1989, those patients treated with radiosurgery had a significantly improved 2-year and median survival (p = 0.01) corresponding with a standardized mortality risk ratio of 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 0.85]. This improvement in survival was seen predominantly for the worse prognostic classes (classes 3-6). The 2-year survival for the radiosurgical patients compared with the previously reported patients was 81% vs. 76% for classes 1/2, 75% vs. 35% for class 3, 34% vs. 15% for class 4, and 21% vs. 6% for classes 5/6, respectively. Although Karnofsky performance status and prognostic class were significant on univariate analysis, only the Karnofsky score was a significant predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis. Median and 2-year survival for patients with a Karnofsky score > or = 70 was 106 weeks and 51%, respectively, as compared to 38 weeks and 0% for patients with a Karnofsky score < 70% (p = 0.001). The addition of radiosurgery to conventional treatment (surgery and external beam radiotherapy) of malignant gliomas appears to improve survival when compared to historical reports. These results should be interpreted with caution because the recursive partitioning model does not completely predict the prognosis of the patients treated in the present study. Although this study suggests that radiosurgery may prolong survival in patients with malignant gliomas, the role of radiosurgery in the management of these patients remains to be defined by a prospective randomized trial.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 58%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,642,348
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#3,992
of 15,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,267
of 34,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
#16
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.