↓ Skip to main content

Functional Comorbidity Index in Sleep Apnea

Overview of attention for article published in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional Comorbidity Index in Sleep Apnea
Published in
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, January 2014
DOI 10.1177/0194599813518164
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

(1) Measure the association between the Functional Comorbidity Index (range, 0-18) and physical function health status (SF-36 Physical Function domain), general physical health status (SF-36 Physical Component Score), and general mental health status (SF-36 Mental Component Score) outcome measures in a cohort of sleep apnea patients. (2) Test if the Functional Comorbidity Index is more strongly associated (a better predictor) than the well-known Charlson Comorbidity Index (range, 0-37) with these SF-36 outcome measures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Psychology 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,578,575
of 29,485,101 outputs
Outputs from Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
#751
of 4,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,967
of 335,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
#11
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,485,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.