Comparison of silver-staining nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) counts and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression in reactive mesothelial hyperplasia and malignant mesothelioma
Previous workers have used counts of colloidal silver-stained nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) to help distinguish reactive from malignant mesothelial processes. We sought to compare the demanding technique of AgNOR counting with the identification of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in 10 pleural malignant mesotheliomas and 11 reactive mesothelial proliferations. The mean AgNOR count was significantly higher in malignant compared to reactive lesions (5.10 [95% confidence interval, CI 4.35-5.84] vs 3.68 [95% CI 3.17-4.19], p = 0.004), as was the PCNA index (26.9 [95% CI 17.37-36.49] vs 9.67 [95% CI 4.94-14.39], p = 0.004). Less overlap was seen with PCNA indices and no reactive mesothelial proliferations had a PCNA index greater than 20%, suggesting that scores over this level may be a specific indicator of malignancy in this setting. There was only a weak correlation between the 2 proliferation indices suggesting that PCNA and AgNORs are present at somewhat different times of the cell cycle and/or persist in the post-S phase cell for variable lengths of time.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#19,156,174
of 27,777,630 outputs
Outputs from Pathology
#922
of 1,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,159
of 81,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,777,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,649 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
