↓ Skip to main content

A new measure of attitudes toward sexually predatory tactics and its relation to the triarchic model of psychopathy.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Personality Disorders, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A new measure of attitudes toward sexually predatory tactics and its relation to the triarchic model of psychopathy.
Published in
Journal of Personality Disorders, June 2013
DOI 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_118
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Psychopathic personality traits are associated with a variety of sexually coercive behaviors. The current study introduced a new measure of attitudes toward sexually predatory tactics and used the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy as a framework for understanding the association between psychopathy and sexual coercion. The new measure, in which respondents rate the behaviors of men employing various sexually coercive tactics, had a two-component structure and was associated with other measures of problematic sexual behaviors. For the vignettes describing manipulative behaviors, men who were bolder, meaner, and more disinhibited rated these behaviors as more acceptable and as behaviors they would be more likely to enact. There was also an interaction between boldness and disinhibition: At higher levels of boldness, disinhibition became a stronger predictor of positive attitudes toward these behaviors. Only disinhibition was related to reporting more positive attitudes toward vignettes describing more extreme and potentially criminal predatory behaviors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 22%
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 63%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2017.
All research outputs
#28,605,296
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Personality Disorders
#725
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,870
of 243,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Personality Disorders
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.