↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to Reduce Sexual Prejudice: A Study-Space Analysis and Meta-Analytic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sex Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interventions to Reduce Sexual Prejudice: A Study-Space Analysis and Meta-Analytic Review
Published in
Journal of Sex Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1080/00224499.2013.871625
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sexual prejudice is an important threat to the physical and mental well-being of lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people. Therefore, we reviewed the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce such prejudice. A study-space analysis was performed on published and unpublished papers from all over the world to identify well-studied and underexplored issues. Most studies were conducted with North American undergraduates and were educational in nature. Dissertations were often innovative and well designed but were rarely published. We then performed meta-analyses on sets of comparable studies. Education, contact with gay people, and combining contact with education had a medium-size effect on several measures of sexual prejudice. The manipulation of social norms was effective in reducing antigay behavior. Other promising interventions, such as the use of entertainment media to promote tolerance, need further investigation. More research is also needed on populations other than American students, particularly groups who may have higher levels of sexual prejudice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Poland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Georgia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 264 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 16%
Student > Master 43 16%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 139 51%
Social Sciences 32 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Decision Sciences 5 2%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 54 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,870,817
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sex Research
#539
of 2,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,354
of 274,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sex Research
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.