The use of oral and intravenous cyclosporin represents a significant advance in the therapy of refractory inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, oral administration of cyclosporin is fraught with improper delivery of cyclosporin to the colon for its topical action. Because of unpredictable metabolism by cytochrome P-450 IIIA, the targeted blood level for systemic effect is not reached at low doses. Furthermore, the doses that have been used for therapy of IBD have been shown to induce several adverse side effects. Thus, an alternate method of delivering cyclosporin to the colon is desirable. In this study, the effect of intracolonically administered cyclosporin was tested for its efficacy to heal mucosal erosions in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Both acute and chronic colitis was induced by feeding female Swiss-Webster mice with 5% DSS (30,000-40,000 mol wt) for five or seven days, respectively. Therapy was advocated prophylactically, prophylaxis plus therapy and therapeutically during the acute and chronic phase of the disease and therapeutically during the chronic phase of the disease. Intracolonic cyclosporin given prophylactically showed adverse effects by increasing the damage to the colonic mucosa. However, intracolonic cyclosporin given therapeutically in 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg after the induction of colitis resulted in dramatic responses in terms of reducing the disease activity and histologic scores, corroborated by complete histological resolution compared to oral cyclosporin given at identical doses. Intracolonic cyclosporin (5 mg/kg) was also very effective in reducing the chronic inflammation. The results of this study highlight the application of this animal model for therapeutic research. Furthermore, cyclosporin administered as an enema provides a new stratagem for the therapy of IBD because of its rapid onset of action at very low doses without the risk inherent in oral or systemic administration.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
14
9%
Immunology and Microbiology
9
6%
Other
16
11%
Unknown
51
34%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2025.
All research outputs
#3,494,737
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#445
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,177
of 20,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
