↓ Skip to main content

Non-Kondo-like Electronic Structure in the Correlated Rare-Earth Hexaboride YbB6

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Non-Kondo-like Electronic Structure in the Correlated Rare-Earth Hexaboride YbB6
Published in
Physical Review Letters, January 2015
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.114.016403
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We present angle-resolved photoemission studies on the rare-earth-hexaboride YbB_{6}, which has recently been predicted to be a topological Kondo insulator. Our data do not agree with the prediction and instead show that YbB_{6} exhibits a novel topological insulator state in the absence of a Kondo mechanism. We find that the Fermi level electronic structure of YbB_{6} has three 2D Dirac cone like surface states enclosing the Kramers's points, while the f orbital that would be relevant for the Kondo mechanism is ∼1  eV below the Fermi level. Our first-principles calculation shows that the topological state that we observe in YbB_{6} is due to an inversion between Yb d and B p bands. These experimental and theoretical results provide a new approach for realizing novel correlated topological insulator states in rare-earth materials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Vietnam 1 2%
Taiwan 1 2%
Unknown 52 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Professor 8 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 33 59%
Materials Science 6 11%
Chemistry 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2026.
All research outputs
#11,912,939
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#23,258
of 51,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,431
of 409,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#205
of 588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.