↓ Skip to main content

Psychodynamic Techniques Related to Outcome for Anxiety Disorder Patients at Different Points in Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Psychodynamic Techniques Related to Outcome for Anxiety Disorder Patients at Different Points in Treatment
Published in
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, May 2014
DOI 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000137
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although psychodynamic therapy has a well-articulated model of therapeutic change for anxiety, few empirical studies have examined specific treatment interventions related to symptom improvement. We examined the degree of adherence to a psychodynamic model of therapy (Blagys and Hilsenroth [Clin Psychol 7:167-188, 2000) related to changes in anxiety symptoms across early treatment process. Secondary analyses also examined the use of specific psychodynamic techniques across early treatment process in relation to symptom change. The current study sought to extend the findings of , who found a relationship between the use of psychodynamic techniques in the third session (independent clinical ratings) and reduction in anxiety symptoms at posttreatment (r = 0.46, p = 0.04). Using the same sample of anxiety disorder patients (N = 20), we found a significant relationship between psychodynamic technique and posttreatment change in anxiety symptoms at the ninth session (r = 0.49, p = 0.03) and the mean levels of psychodynamic technique across both third and ninth sessions (r = 0.53, p = 0.02). In addition, specific psychodynamic techniques demonstrated significant relationships or moderate to large effects with posttreatment changes in anxiety symptoms at the third and ninth sessions as well as mean ratings across early treatment (third and ninth sessions). These findings indicate that therapist focus on cyclical intrapersonal patterns in patient actions, feelings, or experience as well as suggestions of alternative ways to understand these experiences or events not previously recognized by the patient (i.e., interpretation) in the early treatment process were particularly helpful in reducing posttreatment anxiety symptoms. Clinical implications and areas for future research will be discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Linguistics 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#24,121,174
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#2,390
of 3,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,562
of 275,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.