Research on the therapeutic alliance suggests patient personality characteristics to be plausible correlates of alliance formation. To date, research has largely focused on the relationship between the alliance and facets of patient personality measured via patient self-report, versus personality syndromes.In the present study, we assess patient personality using a clinician-rated measure-the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure-200 (SWAP-200; Shedler and Westen [Assessment 5:335-355, 1998; Am J Psychiatry 161:1350-1365, 2004; Am J Psychiatry 161:1743-1754, 2004]; Westen and Shedler [Am J Psychiatry 156:258-272, 1999; Am J Psychiatry 156:273-285, 1999])-and investigate the extent to which empirically derived personality configurations correlate with patient-rated alliance. The study sample consisted of 94 patients receiving psychodynamic psychotherapy at an outpatient clinic.The SWAP-200 Dependent Clinical Prototype and Dysphoric: Dependent-Masochistic Q-Factors were found to significantly correlate with early alliance. Also identified were specific SWAP-200 items that independently correlated with early alliance scores.The results of the present study demonstrate a relation between patient personality characteristics and therapeutic alliance that may serve to further a conceptual understanding of the alliance.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#22,071,229
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#2,080
of 3,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,539
of 275,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
