↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Eyes With Hypertensive Uveitis

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Eyes With Hypertensive Uveitis
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, July 2014
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.404
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Uveitic glaucoma is among the most common causes of irreversible visual loss in uveitis. However, glaucoma detection can be obscured by inflammatory changes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,278,325
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#4,988
of 6,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,268
of 242,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#34
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.