↓ Skip to main content

The Epidemiology of Appendicitis and Appendectomy in South Korea: National Registry Data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Epidemiology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Epidemiology of Appendicitis and Appendectomy in South Korea: National Registry Data
Published in
Journal of Epidemiology, December 2009
DOI 10.2188/jea.je20090011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung Hun Lee, Young Sun Park, Joong Sub Choi

Abstract

Appendicitis is one of the most frequent acute surgical conditions of the abdomen, and appendectomy is one of the most commonly performed operations in the world. However, epidemiological data on appendicitis have not been reported for South Korean or East Asian populations. We analyzed the epidemiological features and lifetime risk of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea using data collected for the national health insurance database from 2005 through 2007. Appendectomy was performed in 59.70% of inpatients diagnosed with appendicitis. The overall incidences of appendicitis, total appendectomy, and perforated appendectomy were 22.71, 13.56, and 2.91 per 10 000 population per year, respectively. The incidence of appendicitis and appendectomy showed clear seasonality, with a peak in summer. The standardized lifetime risks of appendicitis and appendectomy were constant from 2005 through 2007. A life table model suggests that the lifetime risk of appendicitis is 16.33% for males and 16.34% for females, and that the lifetime risk of appendectomy is 9.89% for males and 9.61% for females. As compared to results obtained in research on Western populations, appendicitis and appendectomy had a similar perforation rate and seasonality, but a higher overall incidence, in South Koreans. Between 2005 and 2007, the incidence of appendicitis and appendectomy was constant. Overall, an estimated 15 incidental appendectomies are performed to prevent 1 inpatient with suspected appendicitis, and 26 incidental appendectomies are performed to prevent 1 appendectomy. Incidental appendectomy may have greater preventive value in Koreans.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Other 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 45 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 49 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology
#601
of 916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,437
of 172,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.