↓ Skip to main content

Motivated Expectations of Positive Feedback in Social Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Social Psychology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Motivated Expectations of Positive Feedback in Social Interactions
Published in
The Journal of Social Psychology, May 2011
DOI 10.1080/00224545.2010.503722
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

People self-enhance in a variety of ways. For example, they generally expect to perform better than others, to be in control of events, and to have a brighter future. Might they also self-enhance by expecting to receive positive feedback in social interactions? Across five studies, we found that they did. People's desire for feedback correlated with how positive they expected it to be (Study 1), and their feedback expectations were more positive for themselves than for others (Study 2). People's positive feedback expectations also covaried with trait tendencies to self-enhance (i.e., self-esteem and narcissism; Study 3) and with a direct situational manipulation of self-enhancement motivation (Study 4). Finally, people expected to receive positive feedback but did not consistently expect to receive self-verifying feedback (Study 5). These findings are consistent with social expectations being driven in part by the self-enhancement motive.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 49%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2011.
All research outputs
#18,042,085
of 28,081,780 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Social Psychology
#782
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,613
of 131,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Social Psychology
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,081,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.