↓ Skip to main content

Integrating Social and Biologic Factors in Health Research: A Systems View

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Epidemiology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Integrating Social and Biologic Factors in Health Research: A Systems View
Published in
Annals of Epidemiology, June 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

An important focus of recent calls for interdisciplinary approaches in health research has been the integration of social and biomedical sciences in understanding the causes of ill-health. Typical models for the incorporation of social factors into biomedical research include social factors as distal antecedents of more proximate biologic factors and gene-environment interaction. Under both models the distinction between social and biologic factors remains clear-cut, and consideration of social factors is not indispensable for understanding the biologic processes leading to disease. However, recent evidence suggests that social and biologic processes are inextricably linked in systems. This paper reviews models for the incorporation of social factors into the study of health, discusses the potentialities of systems approaches, and highlights implications for population health and epidemiology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Spain 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 165 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 58 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Psychology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,939,431
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Epidemiology
#371
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,362
of 91,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Epidemiology
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.