↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacomicrobiomics: The Impact of Human Microbiome Variations on Systems Pharmacology and Personalized Therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 733)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pharmacomicrobiomics: The Impact of Human Microbiome Variations on Systems Pharmacology and Personalized Therapeutics
Published in
OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, July 2014
DOI 10.1089/omi.2014.0018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Egypt 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 267 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 20%
Student > Master 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 21 8%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 60 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 6%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 71 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2026.
All research outputs
#1,329,540
of 29,961,645 outputs
Outputs from OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
#26
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,899
of 249,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,961,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them