↓ Skip to main content

Adverse Drug Effect Detection

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adverse Drug Effect Detection
Published in
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, January 2013
DOI 10.1109/titb.2012.2227272
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Large collections of electronic patient records provide abundant but under-explored information on the real-world use of medicines. Although they are maintained for patient administration, they provide a broad range of clinical information for data analysis. One growing interest is drug safety signal detection from these longitudinal observational data. In this paper, we proposed two novel algorithms-a likelihood ratio model and a Bayesian network model-for adverse drug effect discovery. Although the performance of these two algorithms is comparable to the state-of-the-art algorithm, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, the combination of three works better due to their diversity in solutions. Since the actual adverse drug effects on a given dataset cannot be absolutely determined, we make use of the simulated observational medical outcomes partnership (OMOP) dataset constructed with the predefined adverse drug effects to evaluate our methods. Experimental results show the usefulness of the proposed pattern discovery method on the simulated OMOP dataset by improving the standard baseline algorithm-chi-square-by 23.83%.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 5 10%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Decision Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,156,784
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
#513
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,611
of 288,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.