↓ Skip to main content

Anticancer activities of cranberry phytochemicals: An update

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anticancer activities of cranberry phytochemicals: An update
Published in
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, May 2008
DOI 10.1002/mnfr.200700433
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Studies employing mainly in vitro tumor models show that extracts and compounds isolated from cranberry fruit (Vaccinium macrocarpon) inhibit the growth and proliferation of several types of tumor including breast, colon, prostate, and lung. Proanthocyanidin oligomers, flavonol and anthocyanin glycosides and triterpenoids are all likely contributors to the observed anticancer properties and may act in a complementary fashion to limit carcinogenesis. Possible chemopreventive mechanisms of action by cranberry phytochemicals include induction of apoptosis in tumor cells, reduced ornithine decarboxylase activity, decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinases associated with prostate tumor metastasis, and anti-inflammatory activities including inhibition of cyclooxygenases. A review of recent studies suggests a potential role for cranberry as a dietary chemopreventive and provides direction for future research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 19%
Engineering 24 18%
Chemistry 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 8%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,117,457
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
#521
of 3,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,348
of 138,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.