↓ Skip to main content

Language Production in Children With and At Risk for Delay: Mediating Role of Parenting Skills

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Language Production in Children With and At Risk for Delay: Mediating Role of Parenting Skills
Published in
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, April 2014
DOI 10.1080/15374416.2014.900718
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The current study examined the effect of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), a parent-training intervention for child behavior problems, on child language production. Participants were 46 children (ages 20-70 months) with externalizing behavior problems and with or at risk for developmental delay. Parent-child dyads were randomly assigned to a waitlist control or immediate treatment group. Parenting skills learned during PCIT (i.e., "do skills") and children's word tokens and word types were measured at baseline and 4 months later. Findings suggest an indirect effect of parent do skills on the relation between group and child word types, such that more parent do skills predicted more child word types for families receiving PCIT. The present study found that mothers' use of child-directed skills played an important role in the growth and improvement of child language. Results suggest that parent-training interventions targeting child behavior problems may also foster child language production.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 239 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Researcher 16 7%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 87 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Social Sciences 18 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Linguistics 6 3%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 93 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,490,672
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Child &amp; Adolescent Psychology
#401
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,742
of 274,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Child &amp; Adolescent Psychology
#10
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.