↓ Skip to main content

Drug labeling in the practice of obstetric anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Drug labeling in the practice of obstetric anesthesia
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.04.040
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This commentary outlines the current drug labeling practices that potentially compromise the clinical care of pregnant women and their children. We highlight the need for drug manufacturers and lawmakers to change the status quo and consider practices and regulations that will provide much-needed guidance to clinicians on the safe administration of drugs to certain populations such as pregnant and nursing women. Current practices have de facto contributed to a situation in which evidence is inadequate for individual physicians and patients to weigh the risks and benefits of drug administration and make informed decisions for drug use during pregnancy and lactation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,387,916
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#6,415
of 17,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,832
of 275,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#41
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.