↓ Skip to main content

Modification of high saturated fat diet with n‐3 polyunsaturated fat improves glucose intolerance and vascular dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Modification of high saturated fat diet with n‐3 polyunsaturated fat improves glucose intolerance and vascular dysfunction
Published in
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, September 2012
DOI 10.1111/dom.12004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ability of dietary enrichment with monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), n-3 or n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) to reverse glucose intolerance and vascular dysfunction resulting from excessive dietary saturated fatty acids is not resolved. We hypothesized that partial replacement of dietary saturated fats with n-3 PUFA-enriched menhaden oil (MO) would provide greater improvement in glucose tolerance and vascular function compared to n-6 enriched safflower oil (SO) or MUFA-enriched olive oil (OO).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#21,654,704
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#3,239
of 6,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,915
of 229,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#23
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.