↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR transcriptional repression devices and layered circuits in mammalian cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
patent
15 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
515 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CRISPR transcriptional repression devices and layered circuits in mammalian cells
Published in
Nature Methods, May 2014
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2969
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A key obstacle to creating sophisticated genetic circuits has been the lack of scalable device libraries. Here we present a modular transcriptional repression architecture based on clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system and examine approaches for regulated expression of guide RNAs in human cells. Subsequently we demonstrate that CRISPR regulatory devices can be layered to create functional cascaded circuits, which provide a valuable toolbox for engineering purposes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 515 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 487 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 146 28%
Researcher 112 22%
Student > Bachelor 53 10%
Student > Master 43 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 70 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 215 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 120 23%
Engineering 44 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Other 36 7%
Unknown 80 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2026.
All research outputs
#1,247,389
of 33,704,742 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,529
of 6,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,023
of 271,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#23
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,704,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.