↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Pathophysiology and Lung Mechanics in Anesthesiology A Case-Based Overview

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology Clinics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pulmonary Pathophysiology and Lung Mechanics in Anesthesiology A Case-Based Overview
Published in
Anesthesiology Clinics, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.anclin.2012.08.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Anesthesia, surgical requirements, and patients' unique pathophysiology all combine to make the accumulated knowledge of respiratory physiology and lung mechanics vital in patient management. This article take a case-based approach to discuss how the complex interactions between anesthesia, surgery, and patient disease affect patient care with respect to pulmonary pathophysiology and clinical decision making. Two disparate scenarios are examined: a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing a lung resection, and a patient with coronary artery disease undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. The impacts of important concepts in pulmonary physiology and respiratory mechanics on clinical management decisions are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Other 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2014.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology Clinics
#282
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,879
of 226,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology Clinics
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.