↓ Skip to main content

Child Supervision and Burn Outcome among Admitted Patients at Major Trauma Hospitals in the Gambia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Child Supervision and Burn Outcome among Admitted Patients at Major Trauma Hospitals in the Gambia
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, July 2017
DOI 10.3390/ijerph14080856
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Burn-related injuries are a significant burden in children, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where more than 90% of burn-related pediatric deaths occur. Lack of adult supervision of children is a major risk for pediatric burn injuries. The goal of this paper was to examine the general characteristics of burns and identify burn injury outcomes among adult-supervised children compared to those who were not supervised. The study examined burn injury and clinical characteristics among all burn patients admitted to two trauma hospitals in The Gambia, West Africa. At intake in the emergency room, the treating physician or nurse determined the need for admission based on body surface area burned (BSAB), depth of burn, and other clinical considerations such as co-occurring injuries and co-morbidities. During the study period of 1 April 2014 through 31 October 2016, 105 burn patients were admitted and data were collected by the treating physician for all of them. Information about supervision was only asked for children aged five years or less. More than half (51%) of the burn patients were children under 18 years, and 22% were under 5 years. Among children under five, most (86.4%) were supervised by an adult at the time of burn event. Of the 19 supervised children, 16 (84.2%) had body area surface burned (BSAB) of less than 20%. Two of the three children without adult supervision at the time of burn event had BSAB ≥ 20%. Overall, 59% of the patients had 20% + BSAB. Females (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.43-3.62), those burned in rural towns and villages (aOR = 2.29; 95% CI = 0.69-7.57), or burned by fire or flames (aOR = 1.47; 95% CI = 0.51-4.23) had increased odds of having a BSAB ≥ 20%, although these differences were not statistically significant. Children 0-5 years or 5-18 years (aOR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01-0.17; aOR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.02-0.23, respectively) were less likely to have BSAB ≥ 20% than adults. Those burned in a rural location (aOR = 9.23, 95% CI = 2.30-37.12) or by fire or flames (aOR = 6.09, 95% CI = 1.55-23.97) were more likely to die. Children 0-5 years or 5-18 years (aOR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.03-1.18; aOR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.11-1.570, respectively) were less likely to die. Children constitute a significant proportion of admitted burn patients, and most of them were supervised at the time of the burn event. Supervised children (compared to unsupervised children) had less severe burns. Programs that focus on burn prevention at all levels including child supervision could increase awareness and reduce burns or their severity. Programs need to be designed and evaluated with focus on the child development stage and the leading causes of burns by age group.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Lecturer 5 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 34 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 34 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,541,418
of 27,788,586 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#16,803
of 33,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,974
of 332,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#165
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.