↓ Skip to main content

Germline mutations in WTX cause a sclerosing skeletal dysplasia but do not predispose to tumorigenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
105 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Germline mutations in WTX cause a sclerosing skeletal dysplasia but do not predispose to tumorigenesis
Published in
Nature Genetics, December 2008
DOI 10.1038/ng.270
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Abnormalities in WNT signaling are implicated in a broad range of developmental anomalies and also in tumorigenesis. Here we demonstrate that germline mutations in WTX (FAM123B), a gene that encodes a repressor of canonical WNT signaling, cause an X-linked sclerosing bone dysplasia, osteopathia striata congenita with cranial sclerosis (OSCS; MIM300373). This condition is typically characterized by increased bone density and craniofacial malformations in females and lethality in males. The mouse homolog of WTX is expressed in the fetal skeleton, and alternative splicing implicates plasma membrane localization of WTX as a factor associated with survival in males with OSCS. WTX has also been shown to be somatically inactivated in 11-29% of cases of Wilms tumor. Despite being germline for such mutations, individuals with OSCS are not predisposed to tumor development. The observed phenotypic discordance dependent upon whether a mutation is germline or occurs somatically suggests the existence of temporal or spatial constraints on the action of WTX during tumorigenesis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 23 25%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2025.
All research outputs
#4,218,072
of 31,634,113 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#4,415
of 8,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,679
of 225,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#39
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,634,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.