↓ Skip to main content

Orthophosphorus Contributions to Total Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in Iowa Agricultural Watersheds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Quality, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Orthophosphorus Contributions to Total Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in Iowa Agricultural Watersheds
Published in
Journal of Environmental Quality, July 2017
DOI 10.2134/jeq2017.01.0015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is delivered to streams as episodic particulate P and more continuous soluble P (orthophosphorus [OP]), and it is important to determine the proportion of each P form in river water to more effectively design remedial measures. In this study, we evaluated the annual mean ratios of OP to total P (TP) concentrations and loads in 12 Iowa rivers and found systematic variation in the ratios. The OP/TP ratios were >60% in two tile-drained watersheds of the Des Moines Lobe and in a shallow fractured bedrock watershed in northeast Iowa, whereas in southern and western Iowa, OP contributions to TP were <30%. Higher OP/TP ratios were associated with greater row crop intensity in the watershed and a greater proportion of baseflow in the river. Orthophosphorus contributions from croplands would be greater in watersheds characterized by widespread tile drainage and well-drained soils, whereas cropland TP export would be dominated by particulate P in dissected till plains with poorly drained soils. Understanding the dominant form and transport pathway of P from agricultural areas in a watershed is seen as an important first step in determining appropriate conservation practices to reduce P loads.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,801,082
of 26,287,478 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Quality
#1,008
of 3,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,896
of 332,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Quality
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,287,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.