↓ Skip to main content

Elevated Pancreatic Polypeptide Levels in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Diabetes Mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Pancreas, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Elevated Pancreatic Polypeptide Levels in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Diabetes Mellitus
Published in
Pancreas, May 2014
DOI 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000082
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) that secrete primarily pancreatic polypeptide (PP) are rare and usually nonfunctional. There are approximately 2 dozen reports of PP-secreting PNETs, 3 of which have been associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). None suggest a mechanism for the association between PP-secreting PNETs and DM. We describe 5 patients with PP-producing tumors who were diagnosed with DM at the same time as their PNETs, review the literature on PP, and consider its role in the pathophysiology of DM. The cases discussed were extracted from our surgical neuroendocrine tumor database. We examined all patients with PP-predominant PNETs--both with DM (n = 5) and without (n = 8). The 5 patients with DM at the time of PNET diagnosis demonstrated improvement or resolution of their DM postoperatively. In the patients with PP-secreting PNETs but no diagnosis of DM preoperatively, 1 became hypoglycemic postoperatively, and 2 others developed postoperative DM. The 5 cases discussed in detail raise the question of whether the hypersecretion of PP in PNETs might be an important event leading to the development of DM. Although the literature does not provide a mechanism for this association, it may be related to the role of PP in hepatic glucose regulation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pancreas
#1,595
of 2,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,331
of 242,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pancreas
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,927 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.