↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between executive functioning and language: Examining vocabulary, syntax, and language learning in preschoolers attending Head Start

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The relationship between executive functioning and language: Examining vocabulary, syntax, and language learning in preschoolers attending Head Start
Published in
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.06.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa J. White, Alexandra Alexander, Daryl B. Greenfield

Abstract

Early childhood marks a time of dynamic development within language and cognitive domains. Specifically, a body of research focuses on the development of language as related to executive functions, which are foundational cognitive skills that relate to both academic achievement and social-emotional development during early childhood and beyond. Although there is evidence to support the relationship between language and executive functions, existing studies focus mostly on vocabulary and fail to examine other components of language such as syntax and language learning skills. To address this gap, this study examined the relationship between executive functioning (EF) and three aspects of language: syntax, vocabulary, and language learning. A diverse sample of 182 children (67% Latino and 33% African American) attending Head Start were assessed on both EF and language ability. Findings demonstrated that EF related to a comprehensive latent construct of language composed of vocabulary, syntax, and language learning. EF also related to each individual component of language. This study furthers our understanding of the complex relationship between language and cognitive development by measuring EF as it relates to various components of language in a sample of preschoolers from low-income backgrounds.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 69 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 27%
Social Sciences 29 14%
Linguistics 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 78 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#21,823,355
of 26,796,023 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
#1,512
of 1,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,493
of 333,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
#31
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,796,023 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.