↓ Skip to main content

The enigma of male eating disorders: A critical review and synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology Review, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The enigma of male eating disorders: A critical review and synthesis
Published in
Clinical Psychology Review, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 533 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 97 18%
Student > Master 54 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 7%
Researcher 32 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 6%
Other 63 12%
Unknown 218 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 155 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 3%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Neuroscience 10 2%
Other 49 9%
Unknown 238 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2026.
All research outputs
#512,157
of 34,591,678 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#135
of 1,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,094
of 358,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,591,678 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.