↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Interaction Between Epidural 2-Chloroprocaine and Morphine: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of Drug Administration Timing on the Efficacy of Morphine Analgesia
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, July 2009
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a40cf6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The efficacy and duration of epidural morphine analgesia is diminished when administered after 2-chloroprocaine compared with lidocaine. The mechanism of the interaction between 2-chloroprocaine and morphine is unknown. Possible explanations include differences in the latency and duration of action of the two drugs or opioid receptor antagonism. We hypothesized that administration of epidural morphine 30 min before the initiation of 2-chloroprocaine anesthesia would result in postoperative analgesia of similar duration and quality to that achieved by epidural morphine after the initiation of lidocaine anesthesia in patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 9 33%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2009.
All research outputs
#24,751,637
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,829
of 10,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,784
of 173,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#53
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.