↓ Skip to main content

Changes in cortical excitability during paired associative stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients and healthy subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Research, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in cortical excitability during paired associative stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients and healthy subjects
Published in
Neuroscience Research, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.neures.2017.06.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandra Kačar, Sladjan D. Milanović, Saša R. Filipović, Miloš R. Ljubisavljević

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) combines repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation with motor cortex (M1) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), to induce plastic-like changes of cortical excitability. While much attention has been dedicated to post-PAS effects little is known about processes during PAS. We compared the time-course of changes in M1 excitability during standard facilitatory PAS intervention among patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), known to have diminished post-PAS response, and healthy subjects. Compared to baseline pre-PAS MEPs, conditioned MEPs during PAS decreased significantly in both groups. The decrease was significantly larger in healthy subjects than in PD patients, regardless whether patients were drug-naïve or not. Although post-PAS excitability increase was also larger in healthy subjects than in PD patients, there was no significant correlation between the two phenomena, i.e. the extent of MEP decrease during PAS and the extent of the post-PAS excitability increase. The results highlight an apparent physiological paradox that repetitive application of an inhibitory stimulation pattern leads to subsequent prolonged facilitation, thus broadening the understanding of the phenomenology of PAS response. Results also suggest that in PD cortical circuits involved in conveying inhibition during PAS, are impaired at the clinical onset of the disease and are not influenced by subsequent PD treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Other 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Psychology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Research
#1,045
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,597
of 331,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Research
#20
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.