↓ Skip to main content

Directed Evolution of Multivalent Glycopeptides Tightly Recognized by HIV Antibody 2G12

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Directed Evolution of Multivalent Glycopeptides Tightly Recognized by HIV Antibody 2G12
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, March 2014
DOI 10.1021/ja500678v
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Herein, we report a method for in vitro selection of multivalent glycopeptides, combining mRNA display with incorporation of unnatural amino acids and "click" chemistry. We have demonstrated the use of this method to design potential glycopeptide vaccines against HIV. From libraries of ~10(13) glycopeptides containing multiple Man9 glycan(s), we selected variants that bind to HIV broadly neutralizing antibody 2G12 with picomolar to low nanomolar affinity. This is comparable to the strength of the natural 2G12-gp120 interaction, and is the strongest affinity achieved to date with constructs containing 3-5 glycans. These glycopeptides are therefore of great interest in HIV vaccine design.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 35%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 30 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,841,636
of 34,300,846 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#7,097
of 90,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,037
of 267,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#68
of 547 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,300,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 547 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.