We examined the associations between changes in dietary inflammatory potential and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in 87,042 postmenopausal women recruited from 1993-1998 into the Women's Health Initiative. Food frequency questionnaire data were used to compute patterns of change in dietary inflammatory index (DII) scores and cumulative average DII scores over 3 years. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for CRC risk. After a median 16.2 years follow-up, 1,038 CRC cases were diagnosed. DII changes were not substantially associated with overall CRC, but proximal colon cancer risk was higher in the pro-inflammatory change DII compared to the anti-inflammatory stable DII groups (hazard ratio = 1.32; 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.74). Among non-users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (Pinteraction = 0.055) the pro-inflammatory stable DII group was at increased risk of overall CRC and proximal colon cancer. Also among non-users of NSAID, risks of overall CRC, colon cancer, and proximal colon cancer were higher in the highest quintile compared to the lowest cumulative average DII quintile (65%, 61%, and 91% increased risk, respectively). Dietary changes towards, or a history of, pro-inflammatory diets are associated with an elevated risk of colon cancer, particularly for proximal colon cancer and among non-users of NSAID.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,360,215
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#7,861
of 9,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,518
of 316,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#100
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
