↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for Stem Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
746 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of Computer-Based Scaffolding in the Context of Problem-Based Learning for Stem Education: Bayesian Meta-analysis
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10648-017-9419-1
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 746 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 746 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 83 11%
Student > Master 58 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 6%
Student > Bachelor 39 5%
Unspecified 25 3%
Other 103 14%
Unknown 395 53%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 91 12%
Mathematics 36 5%
Psychology 30 4%
Arts and Humanities 27 4%
Unspecified 25 3%
Other 127 17%
Unknown 410 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#9,508,297
of 34,644,748 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#598
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,937
of 357,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,644,748 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.