↓ Skip to main content

2015 ISSVD, ISSWSH, and IPPS Consensus Terminology and Classification of Persistent Vulvar Pain and Vulvodynia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sexual Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
2015 ISSVD, ISSWSH, and IPPS Consensus Terminology and Classification of Persistent Vulvar Pain and Vulvodynia
Published in
Journal of Sexual Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.02.167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Bornstein, Andrew T. Goldstein, Colleen K. Stockdale, Sophie Bergeron, Caroline Pukall, Denniz Zolnoun, Deborah Coady, International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease

Abstract

In 2014, the Executive Council of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the Boards of Directors of the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health (ISSWSH), and the International Pelvic Pain Society (IPPS) acknowledged the need to revise the current terminology of vulvar pain, based on the significant increase in high quality etiologic studies published in the last decade. The new terminology was achieved in four steps. The first involved a terminology consensus conference with representatives of the three societies, held in April 2015. Then, an analysis of the relevant published studies was used to establish a level of evidence for each factor associated with vulvodynia. The terminology was amended based on feedback from members of the societies. Finally, each society's board accepted the new terminology. In 2015, the ISSVD, ISSWSH, and IPPS adopted a new vulvar pain and vulvodynia terminology that acknowledges the complexity of the clinical presentation and pathophysiology involved in vulvar pain and vulvodynia, and incorporates new information derived from evidence-based studies conducted since the last terminology published in 2003.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 11 5%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 90 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 100 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2026.
All research outputs
#3,307,339
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sexual Medicine
#1,121
of 4,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,046
of 338,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sexual Medicine
#21
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.