↓ Skip to main content

Development and Validation of the Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Audiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Development and Validation of the Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire
Published in
American Journal of Audiology, September 2014
DOI 10.1044/2014_aja-13-0014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

OBJECTIVES There is an opportunity to create a questionnaire focused on the primary activities impaired by tinnitus and therefore more sensitive to treatments. DESIGN We developed questions on; 1) emotions, 2) hearing, 3) sleep and 4) concentration. A 20-item questionnaire was administered to 158 patients. First, confirmatory factor analysis was used to select 3 questions per domain. Second, factor analysis was used to evaluate the appropriateness of the 12-item questionnaire. RESULTS The analysis indicated that the selected questions successfully represented four independent domains. Scores were correlated with the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (r = 0.77, p < 0.01) and loudness (r = 0.40, p < 0.01). The sleep subscale correlated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Index (r = 0.68, p < 0.01); the emotion subscale correlated with the Beck Inventory (r = 0.66, p < 0.01) and the Trait Anxiety questionnaire (r = 0.67, p < 0.01). The average scores went from 51 to 38% following treatment. CONCLUSIONS The Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire is valid, reliable, and sensitive and can be used to determine in clinical trials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,134,638
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Audiology
#291
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,927
of 237,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Audiology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.