↓ Skip to main content

Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes as a Step towards Collaborative Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes as a Step towards Collaborative Medicine
Published in
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.prrv.2013.04.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been successfully developed for a variety of chronic respiratory diseases, such as asthma and cystic fibrosis (CF). They have recently been used to evaluate the efficacy of new medications and assess current patient functioning. Although regulatory bodies have favored PROs that measures symptoms, other domains of functioning, such as treatment burden, should be considered. This review examines current guidelines for the development and application of PROs in clinical trials, describes methods for selecting appropriate measures for paediatric populations, and presents a model incorporating PROs into clinical practice. Guidance on interpretation of these measures and graphic presentation of results are illustrated. PROs can serve as the link between the health care provider and patient to foster collaborative and personalized medicine. This model promotes greater patient responsibility, facilitates communication with providers, encourages shared decision-making, and enhances adherence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 28%
Psychology 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
#551
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,587
of 207,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.