↓ Skip to main content

Soil-to-root vegetable transfer factors for 226Ra, 232Th, 40K, and 88Y in Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Soil-to-root vegetable transfer factors for 226Ra, 232Th, 40K, and 88Y in Malaysia
Published in
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.04.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Soil-to-plant transfer factors (TFs) are of fundamental importance in assessing the environmental impact due to the presence of radioactivity in soil and agricultural crops. Tapioca and sweet potato, both root crops, are popular foodstuffs for a significant fraction of the Malaysian population, and result in intake of radionuclides. For the natural field conditions experienced in production of these foodstuffs, TFs and the annual effective dose were evaluated for the natural radionuclides (226)Ra, (232)Th, (40)K, and for the anthropogenic radionuclide (88)Y, the latter being a component of fallout. An experimental tapioca field was developed for study of the time dependence of plant uptake. For soil samples from all study locations other than the experimental field, it has been shown that these contain the artificial radionuclide (88)Y, although the uptake of (88)Y has only been observed in the roots of the plant Manihot esculenta (from which tapioca is derived) grown in mining soil. The estimated TFs for (226)Ra and (232)Th for tapioca and sweet potato are very much higher than that reported by the IAEA. For all study areas, the annual effective dose from ingestion of tapioca and sweet potato are estimated to be lower than the world average (290 μSv y(-1)).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 46 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 21 19%
Environmental Science 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Chemistry 7 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 54 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
#1,382
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,554
of 242,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.