↓ Skip to main content

“Willing but Unwilling”: Attitudinal barriers to adoption of home-based health information technology among older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Health Informatics Journal, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
“Willing but Unwilling”: Attitudinal barriers to adoption of home-based health information technology among older adults
Published in
Health Informatics Journal, September 2013
DOI 10.1177/1460458213486906
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While much research focuses on adoption of electronic health-care records and other information technology among health-care providers, less research explores patient attitudes. This qualitative study examines barriers to adoption of home-based health information technology, particularly personal electronic health records, among older adults. We conducted in-depth interviews (30-90 min duration) with 35 American adults, aged 46-72 years, to determine their perceptions of and attitudes toward home-based health information technology. Analysis of interview data revealed that most barriers to adoption fell under four themes: technological discomfort, privacy or security concerns, lack of relative advantage, and perceived distance from the user representation. Based on our findings, systems to promote home-based health information technology should incorporate familiar computer applications, alleviate privacy and security concerns, and align with older adults' active and engaged self-image.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 158 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 47 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Computer Science 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 7%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 54 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Health Informatics Journal
#423
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,059
of 201,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Informatics Journal
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.