↓ Skip to main content

Improving PMTCT Uptake in Rural South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC), June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Improving PMTCT Uptake in Rural South Africa
Published in
Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC), June 2013
DOI 10.1177/2325957413488203
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

IntroductionDespite the widespread availability of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs, many women in sub-Saharan Africa do not participate in PMTCT. This pilot study aimed to utilize partner participation in an intervention to support PMTCT uptake.MethodsCouples (n = 239) were randomized to receive either a comprehensive couples-based PMTCT intervention or the standard of care.ResultsCompared to the standard of care, participants receiving the intervention increased HIV- and PMTCT-related knowledge (F 1,474 = 13.94, p = .004) and uptake of PMTCT, as defined by infant medication dosing (74% vs. 46%, χ(2) = 4.69, p = .03).DiscussionResults indicate that increasing male attendance at antenatal clinic visits may be "necessary but not sufficient" to increase PMTCT uptake. Increasing HIV knowledge of both partners and encouraging active male participation in the PMTCT process through psychoeducational interventions may be a strategy to increase the uptake of PMTCT in South Africa.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 215 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 60 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 17%
Social Sciences 22 10%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 66 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,295,417
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
#121
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,419
of 240,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.