↓ Skip to main content

Development of a Staff Recall System for Mass Casualty Incidents Using Cell Phone Text Messaging

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Development of a Staff Recall System for Mass Casualty Incidents Using Cell Phone Text Messaging
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, March 2010
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181cb3f9e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

After a mass casualty incident (MCI), rapid mobilization of hospital personnel is required because of an expected surge of victims. Risk assessment of our department's manual phone tree recall system revealed multiple weaknesses that would limit an effective response. Because cell phone use is widespread within the department, we developed and tested a staff recall system, based in our anesthesia information management system (AIMS), using Short Message Service (SMS) text messaging.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Computer Science 6 6%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2010.
All research outputs
#24,815,998
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,836
of 10,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,284
of 144,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#60
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.