You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-017-0248-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henry D. Adams, Melanie J. B. Zeppel, William R. L. Anderegg, Henrik Hartmann, Simon M. Landhäusser, David T. Tissue, Travis E. Huxman, Patrick J. Hudson, Trenton E. Franz, Craig D. Allen, Leander D. L. Anderegg, Greg A. Barron-Gafford, David J. Beerling, David D. Breshears, Timothy J. Brodribb, Harald Bugmann, Richard C. Cobb, Adam D. Collins, L. Turin Dickman, Honglang Duan, Brent E. Ewers, Lucía Galiano, David A. Galvez, Núria Garcia-Forner, Monica L. Gaylord, Matthew J. Germino, Arthur Gessler, Uwe G. Hacke, Rodrigo Hakamada, Andy Hector, Michael W. Jenkins, Jeffrey M. Kane, Thomas E. Kolb, Darin J. Law, James D. Lewis, Jean-Marc Limousin, David M. Love, Alison K. Macalady, Jordi Martínez-Vilalta, Maurizio Mencuccini, Patrick J. Mitchell, Jordan D. Muss, Michael J. O’Brien, Anthony P. O’Grady, Robert E. Pangle, Elizabeth A. Pinkard, Frida I. Piper, Jennifer A. Plaut, William T. Pockman, Joe Quirk, Keith Reinhardt, Francesco Ripullone, Michael G. Ryan, Anna Sala, Sanna Sevanto, John S. Sperry, Rodrigo Vargas, Michel Vennetier, Danielle A. Way, Chonggang Xu, Enrico A. Yepez, Nate G. McDowell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 33% |
| France | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 55% |
| Scientists | 36 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 848 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 848 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 162 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 127 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 57 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 4% |
| Other | 113 | 13% |
| Unknown | 192 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 253 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 213 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 58 | 7% |
| Engineering | 18 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 46 | 5% |
| Unknown | 251 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 517. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#49,767
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#141
of 2,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,016
of 331,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#6
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 150.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.