↓ Skip to main content

Intraabdominal Hypertension, Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, and the Open Abdomen

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intraabdominal Hypertension, Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, and the Open Abdomen
Published in
CHEST, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is the endpoint of a process whereby massive interstitial swelling in the abdomen or rapid development of a space-filling lesion within the abdomen (such as ascites or a hematoma) leads to a pathologically increased pressure. This results in so-called Intra-Abdominal Hypertension (IAH), causing decreased perfusion of the kidneys and abdominal viscera and possible difficulties with ventilation and maintenance of cardiac output. These effects contribute to a cascade of ischemia and multiple organ dysfunction with high mortality. A few primary disease processes traditionally requiring large-volume crystalloid resuscitation account for most cases of IAH and ACS. Once IAH is recognized, non-surgical steps to decrease IAP can be undertaken (diuresis / dialysis, evacuation of intraluminal bowel contents, and sedation) although the clinical benefit of such therapies remains largely conjectural. Surgical decompression with midline laparotomy is the standard ultimate treatment once ACS with organ dysfunction is established. There is minimal primary literature on the pathophysiologic underpinnings of IAH and ACS, and few prospective randomized trials evaluating their treatment or prevention; this concise review therefore provides only brief summaries of these topics. Many modern studies nominally dealing with IAH or ACS are simply epidemiological surveys on their incidences, so this paper summarizes incidences of IAH and ACS in a variety of disease states. Especially emphasized is the fact that modern critical care paradigms emphasize rational limitations to fluid resuscitation, which may have contributed to an apparent decrease in ACS among critically ill patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 251 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 41 16%
Student > Postgraduate 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Researcher 17 7%
Student > Master 16 6%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 72 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 76 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,443,004
of 34,619,351 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#2,318
of 18,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,901
of 358,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#40
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,619,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.