↓ Skip to main content

Neurological Complications of Rheumatic Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neurological Complications of Rheumatic Disease
Published in
Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.spen.2016.12.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rheumatic disease represents a broad spectrum of systemic conditions manifested by multisystem involvement and mediated by autoimmunity and inflammation. Their neurological complications may occur at any point in the disease process and are diagnostically challenging. For years central nervous system (CNS) was considered as a system uniquely protected from effects of the immune system because of the blood-brain barrier. Indeed, under physiological conditions immune access to CNS is tightly regulated. Over the past decade, new scientific discoveries highlighted pathways by which immune and neurological systems interact, including a variety of mechanisms controlling permeability of blood-brain barrier, and specific roles that CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocytes play in initiation of specific adaptive immune response to neural specific antigens. This leads to release of proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin 1, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha). In addition, B-cells involved in CNS inflammation produce antibodies against membrane bound and soluble antigens. This article describes specific neurological manifestations of the most common autoimmune rheumatic disorders.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 20%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 43%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Pediatric Neurology
#324
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,547
of 422,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Pediatric Neurology
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.