↓ Skip to main content

Zinc supplementation for preventing mortality, morbidity, and growth failure in children aged 6 months to 12 years of age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
676 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Zinc supplementation for preventing mortality, morbidity, and growth failure in children aged 6 months to 12 years of age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009384.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan Mayo‐Wilson, Jean A, Aamer Imdad, Sohni Dean, Xin Hui S Chan, Evelyn S Chan, Aneil Jaswal, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 676 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 668 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 105 16%
Researcher 84 12%
Student > Bachelor 70 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 8%
Student > Postgraduate 38 6%
Other 107 16%
Unknown 215 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 186 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 7%
Social Sciences 33 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 2%
Other 76 11%
Unknown 230 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2025.
All research outputs
#1,085,422
of 34,518,599 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,959
of 14,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,462
of 275,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.