↓ Skip to main content

NEOPOLYPLOIDY AND DIVERSIFICATION IN HEUCHERA GROSSULARIIFOLIA

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
NEOPOLYPLOIDY AND DIVERSIFICATION IN HEUCHERA GROSSULARIIFOLIA
Published in
Evolution, January 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01208.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Newly formed polyploid lineages must contend with several obstacles to avoid extinction, including minority cytotype exclusion, competition, and inbreeding depression. If polyploidization results in immediate divergence of phenotypic characters these hurdles may be reduced and establishment made more likely. In addition, if polyploidization alters the phenotypic and genotypic associations between traits, that is, the P and G matrices, polyploids may be able to explore novel evolutionary paths, facilitating their divergence and successful establishment. Here, we report results from a study of the perennial plant Heuchera grossulariifolia in which the phenotypic divergence and changes in phenotypic and genotypic covariance matrices caused by neopolyploidization have been estimated. Our results reveal that polyploidization causes immediate divergence for traits relevant to establishment and results in significant changes in the structure of the phenotypic covariance matrix. In contrast, our results do not provide evidence that polyploidization results in immediate and substantial shifts in the genetic covariance matrix.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,472,518
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#4,438
of 5,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,302
of 190,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#23
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.